Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/intel_pstate: Change to disallow module build

[Viresh Kumar]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:44 AM,  <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Load order is important in order for intel_pstate to take over as the
> default scaling driver from acpi-cpufreq.
>
> If both are built-in acpi-cpufreq uses late_initcall() and
> intel_pstate uses device_initcall() so it will be able to register as
> the scaling before acpi-cpufreq for the processors supported by
> intel_pstate.
>
> If acpi-cpufreq is built as a module then intel_pstate still gets
> first option to become the scaling driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/