Re: [patch v5 04/15] sched: add sched balance policies in kernel
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Feb 20 2013 - 04:38:03 EST
* Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Current scheduler behavior is just consider for larger
> performance of system. So it try to spread tasks on more cpu
> sockets and cpu cores
> To adding the consideration of power awareness, the patchset
> adds 2 kinds of scheduler policy: powersaving and balance.
> They will use runnable load util in scheduler balancing. The
> current scheduling is taken as performance policy.
> performance: the current scheduling behaviour, try to spread tasks
> on more CPU sockets or cores. performance oriented.
> powersaving: will pack tasks into few sched group until all LCPU in the
> group is full, power oriented.
> balance : will pack tasks into few sched group until group_capacity
> numbers CPU is full, balance between performance and
Hm, so in a previous review I suggested keeping two main
policies: power-saving and performance, plus a third, default
policy, which automatically switches between these two if/when
the kernel has information about whether a system is on battery
or on AC - and picking 'performance' when it has no information.
Such an automatic policy would obviously be useful to users -
and that is what makes such a feature really interesting and a
I think Peter expressed similar views: we don't want many knobs
and states, we want two major goals plus an (optional but
default enabled) automatism.
Is your 'balance' policy implementing that suggestion?
If not, why not?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/