Re: [ 0/1] 3.0.66-stable review
From: Satoru Takeuchi
Date: Wed Feb 20 2013 - 08:11:14 EST
At Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:49:17 -0700,
Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.66 release.
> > There is 1 patch in this series, which will be posted as a response to
> > this one. If anyone has any issues with it being applied, please let me
> > know.
> > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 20 18:22:38 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.66-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > thanks,
> > greg k-h
> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.65, and 3.4.32
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> HP EliteBook 6930p Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
> Reviewed patches
> Skipped Cross-compile tests
This kernel can be built and boot without any problem.
Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine.
* Its dmesg also looks correct. *
- Build Machine: debian wheezy x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
- Test machine: debian wheezy x86_64(KVM guest on the Build Machine)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/