Re: [PATCH EDACv2 01/12] edac: add support for raw error reports
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Thu Feb 21 2013 - 13:03:21 EST
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:47:59PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:08:21 +0100
> Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:01:25PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > I did this way to to follow the "one patch per logical change rule".
> > > The rationale for this patch is to allow doing raw error reports,
> > > as needed by changeset 06/12.
> > Right, but you're adding a new function so why not add the right version
> > from the get-go? Otherwise the rule above would apply but not for new
> > code, right?
> The rule also applies for both patches.
> Except for making everybody's looking on this code to re-read all patches
> and for me to rebase it again, I can't see any difference between what I
> posted and your proposal to move patch 10 to the beginning of the changeset.
> Anyway, I did it at this separate branch, in order to preserve the previous
> ghes_v2 (also at the same repository):
> Patch 10/12 is now the first patch, and became this one:
> Patch 01/12 is now the second one:
> Obviously, the ghes_edac part of 10/12 got fold into this patch:
> And a couple other patches got side-affected by this change with trivial
> conflicts (patches 9/12 and 11/12). Except for this change, v2 and v3 are
> identical, so I won't re-post it.
Yep, looks good at a quick glance.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/