Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Feb 21 2013 - 21:15:18 EST
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:38:12 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 05:05, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:00 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> This patch is inclined towards providing this infrastructure. Because we are
> >> required to allocate governor's resources dynamically now, we must do it at
> >> policy creation and end. And so got CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT/EXIT.
> > Are those new events NOPs now?
> No. These are used atleast for ondemand & conservative.
They will be after the next patch, you mean? :-)
> >> +#define CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT 4
> >> +#define CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT 4
> > Why don't you use different values here?
> > If you need only one value, one #define should be sufficient.
> Naah, something happened... I got fixed this locally but couldn't
> get that into the commit somehow. EXIT should have 5 here.
Well, it appeared so from the next patch ...
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/