Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Feb 22 2013 - 04:39:44 EST
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 17:10 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 04:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 10:36 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> >> According to my understanding, in the old world, wake_affine() will
> >> only
> >> be used if curr_cpu and prev_cpu share cache, which means they are in
> >> one package, whatever search in llc sd of curr_cpu or prev_cpu, we
> >> won't
> >> have the chance to spread the task out of that package.
> > Nah, look at where SD_WAKE_AFFINE is set. Only 'remote/big' NUMA domains
> > don't have it set, but 'small' NUMA systems will have it set over the
> > entire domain tree.
> Oh, I missed that point...
> But I don't get the reason to make NUMA level affine, cpus in different
> nodes share cache? doesn't make sense...
Contrary, it makes more sense, the more expensive it is to run 'remote'
the better it is to pull 'related' tasks together.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/