Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37:10PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out.  I am wondering if
> there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.

How much would it hurt us if we said 3.8 is the last kernel that
supported NUMAQ? If anyone wants the functionality, they should use 3.8
or older.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/