Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

[Ingo Molnar]

* Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37:10PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out.  I am wondering if
> > there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.
> 
> How much would it hurt us if we said 3.8 is the last kernel that supported NUMAQ? 
> If anyone wants the functionality, they should use 3.8 or older.

v3.9 - any non-trivial patch in the stage of being contemplated near the end of the 
v3.9 merge window is most likely v3.10 material.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/