Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ipc: introduce obtaining a lockless ipc object

From: Michel Lespinasse
Date: Fri Mar 01 2013 - 23:32:49 EST


On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Through ipc_lock() and, therefore, ipc_lock_check() we currently
> return the locked ipc object. This is not necessary for all situations,
> thus introduce, analogous, ipc_obtain_object and ipc_obtain_object_check
> functions that only mark the RCU read critical region without acquiring
> the lock and return the ipc object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@xxxxxx>
> ---
> ipc/util.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> ipc/util.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/util.c b/ipc/util.c
> index 464a8ab..902f282 100644
> --- a/ipc/util.c
> +++ b/ipc/util.c
> @@ -667,6 +667,21 @@ void ipc64_perm_to_ipc_perm (struct ipc64_perm *in, struct ipc_perm *out)
> out->seq = in->seq;
> }
>
> +struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_obtain_object(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
> +{
> + struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
> + int lid = ipcid_to_idx(id);
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + out = idr_find(&ids->ipcs_idr, lid);
> + if (!out) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + return out;
> +}

I think it may be nicer to take the rcu read lock at the call site
rather than in ipc_obtain_object(), to make the rcu read lock/unlock
sites pair up more nicely. Either that or make an inline
ipc_release_object function that pairs up with ipc_obtain_object() and
just does an rcu_read_unlock().

> +
> /**
> * ipc_lock - Lock an ipc structure without rw_mutex held
> * @ids: IPC identifier set
> @@ -679,18 +694,13 @@ void ipc64_perm_to_ipc_perm (struct ipc64_perm *in, struct ipc_perm *out)
>
> struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
> {
> - struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
> - int lid = ipcid_to_idx(id);
> + struct kern_ipc_perm *out = ipc_obtain_object(ids, id);
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - out = idr_find(&ids->ipcs_idr, lid);
> - if (out == NULL) {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (!out)

I think this should be if (IS_ERR(out)) ?

Looks great otherwise.

Acked-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/