Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] net: implement support for low latency socketpolling

[Andi Kleen]

On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:20:01PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 20:21 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Alternative to 2) would be to use a generation id, incremented every
> > > time a napi used in spin polling enabled driver is dismantled (and freed
> > > after RCU grace period)
> > > 
> > > And store in sockets not only the pointer to napi_struct, but the
> > > current generation id : If the generation id doesnt match, disable
> > > the spinpoll until next packet rebuilds the cache again.
> > 
> > This would require rcu_read_lock, aka preempt off, during polling, right?
> > 
> 
> Of course, polling probably needs BH disabling as well to get the per
> napi lock

Ok maybe the cond_resched() is good enough.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/