Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks

From: Christian Gmeiner
Date: Mon Mar 04 2013 - 02:40:44 EST


ping
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc


2013/2/23 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2013/2/15 Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Christian Gmeiner
>> <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> During the development of this driver an in-house register
>>> documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests
>>> were done and this problem was found. It turned out that
>>> the released register documentation is wrong.
>>>
>>> The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.
>>>
>>> Our customers can control LEDs from userspace via Java,
>>> C++ or what every. They have running/working applications where
>>> they want to control led_3 but led_2 get's used.
>>> I got a bug report in our in-house bug tracker so it would be
>>> great to fix this upstream.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks, Christian.
>>
>> And Andrew, are you going to take care of this patch? Or I will merge this.
>>
>
> Whats the current state of the patch? Hope we can get it into 3.9 :)
>
> --
> Christian Gmeiner, MSc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/