Re: linux-next: consider tidying up the xen-two tree

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Mon Mar 04 2013 - 08:56:35 EST


On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:46:05AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> We are at the end of the merge window and the xen-two tree still looks
> like this:
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h | 11 ++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/page.h | 3 +
> arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 9 ++
> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 8 ++
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 76 ++++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/xen/irq.c | 5 +-
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/xen/p2m.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 59 ++++++++++---
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 39 ++++++---
> arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S | 10 ++-
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 11 ++-
> drivers/xen/balloon.c | 14 +--
> drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 4 +-
> drivers/xen/events.c | 9 +-
> drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 3 +-
> drivers/xen/grant-table.c | 115 +++++++++++++------------
> drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c | 9 +-
> include/xen/grant_table.h | 12 ---
> 21 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)
>
> Some of this is from commits going back to December 2011. And there
> are several duplicate commits (with reversions of old versions) as well
> as many merges.
>
> I assume that what is left in there is now v3.10 material (or
> bug/regression fixes), so maybe you should take the opportunity and

Yup.

> rebase the whole lot onto v3.9-rc1 when that is released.

Will do. I didn't know that was an OK thing - thought I had to keep the
history behind (so no rebase).

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/