Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Tue Mar 05 2013 - 05:04:12 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/05/2013 11:01 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:42 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> The e1000e changes didn't get merged, did they? I don't see
>>> the following changes mentioned at
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185 in 3.9-rc1:
>>>
>>> e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance e1000e: fix
>>> runtime power management transitions e1000e: fix accessing to
>>> suspended device
>>
>> You're right. They are not even in -next :(.
>>
>
> I have them in my queue for net, so I should be pushing them later
> this week once validation has a chance to look at them.

Yeah, I've just noticed that here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/25/3

Thanks a lot.

- --
js
suse labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=MGO1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/