Re: Re: [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions inCONFIG_HAS_IOPORT

[Jingoo Han]

On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> On Monday 04 March 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > FWIW, a patch that is doing what I was initially proposing has been
> > merged for 3.9, and it doesn't contain the
> > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) test you were proposing (and which I
> > think was correct). See:
> >
> > commit 9ed8a30f3471347c1b763bd062fa78ae80f18eae
> > Author: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Wed Feb 27 17:02:42 2013 -0800
> >
> 
> Sigh.
> 
> I'll take it as an additional incentive to finally clean up the logic behind
> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT by introducing a CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP symbol to replace it.
> 
> Thanks for the heads up.


Hi Thomas Petazzoni
Sorry, I did not know that you submitted the patch.
Like you, I am developing PCIe Host driver.
Also, I experienced the annoying build error related to
CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.

Hi Arnd Bergmann,
I have just read the mailing thread.
If you resolve this situation properly, it will be very helpful.
Thank you.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
N떑꿩ěr¸›y鉉싕b˛XФ푤vŘ^–)頻{.nÇ+돴ĽŠ{ą묎çzX㎍썳變}Š옽Ć zÚ&j:+v돣žŤ묎çzZ+€Ę+zf＂ˇhš닱~넮녬i˙鎬zšŽwⅱ¸?솳鈺Ú&˘)刪f뷌^j푹y§m끷@AŤa뛴˙0띠hŽĺ’i