Re: kswapd craziness round 2

[Zlatko Calusic]

On 08.03.2013 07:42, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 03/01/2013 03:02 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Ok, no difference, kswap is still crazy. I'm attaching the output of
> > > > "grep -vw '0' /proc/vmstat" if you see something there.
> > > Thanks to you for test and data.
> > >
> > > Lets try to restore the deleted nap, then.
> >
> > Oh, it seems to be nice now:
> > root       579  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Mar04   0:13 [kswapd0]
> Double thanks.
>
> But Mel does not like it, probably.
> Lets try nap in another way.
>
> Hillf
>
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c	Thu Feb 21 20:01:02 2013
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c	Fri Mar  8 14:36:10 2013
> @@ -2793,6 +2793,10 @@ loop_again:
>   				 * speculatively avoid congestion waits
>   				 */
>   				zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
> +
> +			else if (sc.priority > 2 &&
> +				 sc.priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
> +				wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
>   		}
>
>   		/*
> --

There's another bug in there, which I'm still chasing. Artificial sleeps 
like this just mask the real bug and introduce new problems (on my 4GB 
server kswapd spends all the time in those congestion wait calls). The 
problem is that the bug needs about 5 days of uptime to reveal it's ugly 
head. So far I can only tell that it was introduced somewhere between 
3.1 & 3.4.

Also, check shrink_inactive_list(), it already sleeps if really needed:

if (nr_writeback && nr_writeback >=
		(nr_taken >> (DEF_PRIORITY - sc->priority)))
	wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);

Regards,
--
Zlatko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/