Re: [PATCH 1/3] ipack: avoid double free on device->id

[Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/08/2013 06:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:21:45AM +0100, Samuel Iglesias
> Gonsalvez wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>> --- drivers/ipack/ipack.c |    1 + 1 file changed, 1 
>> insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/ipack/ipack.c b/drivers/ipack/ipack.c index 
>> 7ec6b20..599d4ff 100644 --- a/drivers/ipack/ipack.c +++ 
>> b/drivers/ipack/ipack.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static void 
>> ipack_device_release(struct device *dev) { struct ipack_device 
>> *device = to_ipack_dev(dev); kfree(device->id); +	device->id = 
>> NULL;
> 
> How does that keep anything from being freed twice?
> 
>> device->release(device);
> 
> device should now be gone after this call, right?  What am I 
> missing?
> 

Yes, you are right. It's not possible to have it freed twice once it's
in ipack_device_release().

You can skip this patch. If you want, I can resend the others accordingly.

Sam

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJROim2AAoJEH/0ujLxfcNDY+sQAMfrjjs05FJ9wmQvqEFKg18I
QVddG8BbHKDzdmSTkDlagijTE/Q7eOOFV7zOKz6QWJjO14ktPjr56cFwEmIl0KPj
LcDO4+4bIsOfhO64ZJ7CHUFyMcq3olrZNBhQLJZU1anOcDKIimzomGGPXv5PPFe6
BXnRNeXEnS81r3LXQtlJM7h8th3objKWW2R5No40E9sHIKWEgYR7JmgCqhk0fQNv
RKA9FjyBFpF8RjPoi+xSdPYhFPLpOv99ZbYK1wU4goD4ADw9Npujw/66CjFtgJGx
BH3MquLaCYvCmJK6+obQJzWKl1TonQ153hh6uM1b7h+5RJ4yhUSaSPRLLIWGAxRH
3XlbtjMO6bwEDAEg2hOq9whmoVxK70YvjKOCkqo8crwqVsLccMnv4OzoE4NNrm99
8cdUScK8cTi5fg2HuIEJMVTPxpfLk46Ab3OTO9hoVURyRG84TnJ0SLK0CPzy6J1z
ORgZWh7PlEsgLeqsqjKv7q/5tcLLPEGZcV7TekWPBfNVR5aneemHrEIaSIuVYXxw
a7INgvaAWNhqGhag86KwVH0ICbz2xuJu6wtrlFhyMZWhdPN5aEcHwXusjUBhrdrm
DXoEDBFvJShBE8PxNPWYIBcrphetaSQzl0vNsO/SqacGlppsAqtvvU6hkkAuhGeO
a8dpR7nIR8tuz4NPnFHu
=NypR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/