Re: 8250.nr_uarts broken in 3.7

[Josh Boyer]

On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 12:14:23AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 12:10 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 03/08/2013 11:58 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> On 03/08/2013 11:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:47:01PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >>>> Yeah, I agree this is ugly. Just re-definining MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX at
> >>>> the end of the file should do the trick (followed by
> >>>> "module_param(nr_uarts, uint, 0644)").
> >>>
> >>> For some reason, I thought I had tried that.  Maybe I didn't.  I'll look
> >>> into it again.
> >>
> >> I see. Because we would re-define some global variables. What if we put
> >> module_param into a function?
> > 
> > Something like this?
> > #ifdef MODULE

I don't think you want this surrounded in #ifdef MODULE, do you?  That
won't let people building the driver into the kernel continue to use
8250.<whatever> on the kernel command line.

> > static void __unused splat(void) {
> 
> I meant __used. It should make no difference though.
> 
> > #       undef MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX
> > #       define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX "8250."
> >         module_param_cb(nr_uarts, &param_ops_uint, &nr_uarts, 0644);
> >         ...
> > }
> > #endif
> > 
> > Not nice, but should work. The other way is to have those in a separate
> > file linked to 8250 (to avoid re-definition errors).

Ew.  I'll try the function first.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/