Re: [PATCH] net: can: af_can.c: Fix checkpatch warnings

From: Daniel Mack
Date: Sun Mar 10 2013 - 09:06:19 EST


On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hallo Valentin,
>
> thanks for the idea for the cleanup.
>
> But if you replace the the printk() statements it's worth to check if code
> fits into a single line now, e.g.
>
> On 10.03.2013 13:28, Valentin Ilie wrote:
>
> r = NULL;
>> @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
>> int err = 0;
>>
>> if (proto < 0 || proto >= CAN_NPROTO) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
>> + pr_err("can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
>> proto);
>
>
> here " ,proto);" can obviously be move into the previous line while preserving
> the 80 chars per line rule.
>
>
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
>> mutex_lock(&proto_tab_lock);
>>
>> if (proto_tab[proto]) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol %d already registered\n",
>> + pr_err("can: protocol %d already registered\n",
>> proto);
>
>
> here too
>
>> err = -EBUSY;
>> } else
>> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static int can_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,
>> /* create new dev_rcv_lists for this device */
>> d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!d) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR
>> - "can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
>> + pr_err("can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> }
>
>
> As i've seen in former patches from Joe Perches OOM messages are obsolete.
>
> You could write
>
> if(!d)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> here instead.

While at it, why not switch to dev_err() instead?


Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/