Re: [PATCH 07/16] TTY: quatech2, remove unneeded is_open

[Jiri Slaby]

On 03/13/2013 02:46 PM, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> Jiri Slaby writes:
>>
>> tty->ops->break_ctl cannot be called outside the gap between open and
>> close. So there is no need to check whether the port is open in
>> break_ctl in quatech2. Remove the check and also that member
>> completely.
>>
> 
> We can't get rid of is_open.  The devices use 1 read urb for all ports
> and will send various things about ports that haven't actually been
> opened.  So the driver needs to know if a port has actually been
> opened or not.  In fact, I was about to send a patch that fixes a
> warning caused by commit 2e124b4a390ca85325fae75764bef92f0547fa25
> causing the driver to try to write to ttys that weren't actually
> opened.

As long as tty_port exists for the port, calling tty buffer functions is
OK. The warning you mention is now bogus and there is a patch flying
around to disable that at the moment.

It is also that is_open was completely racy, right?

> The guard in qt2_break_ctl() can still be removed.

Ok.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/