Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] seccomp: add generic code for jitted seccompfilters.

From: Eric Paris
Date: Fri Mar 15 2013 - 16:45:44 EST


On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 11:45 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
> > index 6f19cfd..af27494 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
> >
> > #include <linux/thread_info.h>
> > +#include <linux/filter.h>
> > #include <asm/seccomp.h>
> >
> > struct seccomp_filter;
> > @@ -47,6 +48,44 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s)
> > return s->mode;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct seccomp_filter - container for seccomp BPF programs
> > + *
> > + * @usage: reference count to manage the object lifetime.
> > + * get/put helpers should be used when accessing an instance
> > + * outside of a lifetime-guarded section. In general, this
> > + * is only needed for handling filters shared across tasks.
> > + * @prev: points to a previously installed, or inherited, filter
> > + * @len: the number of instructions in the program
> > + * @insns: the BPF program instructions to evaluate
>
> This should be updated to include the new bpf_func field.
>
> Regardless, it'd be better to not expose this structure to userspace.

This is fine....

include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h is exposed to userspace
include/linux/seccomp.h is kernel internal

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/