Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 20 (vmcore)

From: David Rientjes
Date: Wed Mar 20 2013 - 20:10:54 EST

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:

> I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.
> The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is
> meaningless.
> This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end
> of ELF note buffer" merged through the -mm tree. I've added the patch's
> author and Andrew to the cc.
> How can this be protected by CONFIG_KEXEC?

These patches were removed from -mm today so it should no longer be a

If the patchset is reintroduced, please keep this build failure in the
back of your mind, thanks.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at