Re: [PATCH] ARM: sched_clock: Add more notrace to prevent recursion

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Thu Mar 21 2013 - 13:49:56 EST


On 03/14/13 17:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> cyc_to_sched_clock() is called by sched_clock() and cyc_to_ns()
> is called by cyc_to_sched_clock(). I suspect that some compilers
> inline both of these functions into sched_clock() and so we've
> been getting away without having a notrace marking. It seems that
> my compiler isn't inlining cyc_to_sched_clock() though, so I'm
> hitting a recursion bug when I enable the function graph tracer,
> causing my system to crash. Marking these functions notrace fixes
> it. Technically cyc_to_ns() doesn't need the notrace because it's
> already marked inline, but let's just add it so that if we ever
> remove inline from that function it doesn't blow up.

Anyone else seeing this problem?

>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
> index bd6f56b..59d2adb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
> @@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ static u32 notrace jiffy_sched_clock_read(void)
>
> static u32 __read_mostly (*read_sched_clock)(void) = jiffy_sched_clock_read;
>
> -static inline u64 cyc_to_ns(u64 cyc, u32 mult, u32 shift)
> +static inline u64 notrace cyc_to_ns(u64 cyc, u32 mult, u32 shift)
> {
> return (cyc * mult) >> shift;
> }
>
> -static unsigned long long cyc_to_sched_clock(u32 cyc, u32 mask)
> +static unsigned long long notrace cyc_to_sched_clock(u32 cyc, u32 mask)
> {
> u64 epoch_ns;
> u32 epoch_cyc;

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/