Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] pinctrl: gpio: vt8500: Add pincontrol driver forarch-vt8500

From: Tony Prisk
Date: Mon Apr 01 2013 - 15:00:04 EST


On 02/04/13 06:06, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/28/2013 12:10 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
This patch adds support for the GPIO/pinmux controller found on the VIA
VT8500 and Wondermedia WM8xxx-series SoCs.

Each pin within the controller is capable of operating as a GPIO or as
an alternate function. The pins are numbered according to their control
bank/bit so that if new pins are added, the existing numbering is maintained.

All currently supported SoCs are included: VT8500, WM8505, WM8650, WM8750 and
WM8850.
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c b/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
+static int wmt_pctl_dt_node_to_map_pull(struct wmt_pinctrl_data *data,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ u32 pin, u32 pull,
+ struct pinctrl_map **maps)
+ configs[0] = 0;
I assume that should be

configs[0] = pull;
Err, yeah. Oops.
+static int wmt_pctl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct pinctrl_map **map,
+ unsigned *num_maps)
+fail:
+ kfree(maps);
+ return err;
+}
There, I think you also want to iterate over maps[] and free
map->data.configs.config for any PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN.

Perhaps just call wmt_pctl_dt_free_map() here, with roughly nmaps =
cur_map - maps?
I have dropped the kfree() and used devm_kzalloc instead. Makes the fail path tidier as well.
+static int wmt_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec,
+ u32 *flags)
+{
+ if (flags)
+ *flags = gpiospec->args[1];
+
+ return gpiospec->args[0];
+}
Can't you use of_gpio_simple_xlate(), and hence just not set .of_xlate in:
I have dropped this - as you pointed out, ..simple_xlate() is an equivalent.

+static struct gpio_chip wmt_gpio_chip = {
...
+ .of_xlate = wmt_gpio_of_xlate,
Aside from that, this patch,

Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>

Although I didn't review pinctrl-*.c other than pinctrl-wmt.c, since
they're just big tables of data. Oh, except that the following could
probably be moved inside wmt_pinctrl_probe()?

+ struct wmt_pinctrl_data *data;
+ struct resource *res;
+
+ data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate data\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ data->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (!data->base) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to map memory resource\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
I have moved the resource-related portion of this code to the common init. The data part needs to be here to assign the per-soc variables to.

Thanks for the review.
Regards
Tony P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/