Re: [PATCH] x86, amd, mce: Prevent potential cpu-online oops

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 08:05:46PM +0200, Steffen Persvold wrote:
> It made more sense (to me) to skip the creation of MC4 all together
> if you can't find the matching northbridge since you can't reliably
> do the dec_and_test() reference counting on the shared bank when you
> don't have the common NB struct for all the shared cores.
>
> Or am I just smoking the wrong stuff ?

No, actually *this* explanation should've been in the commit message.
You numascale people do crazy things with the hardware :) so explaining
yourself more verbosely is an absolute must if anyone is to understand
why you're changing the code.

So please write a detailed commit message why you need this change,
don't be afraid to talk about the big picture.

Also, I'm guessing this is urgent stuff and it needs to go into 3.9?
Yes, no? If yes, this patch should probably be tagged for stable.

Also, please redo this patch against tip:x86/ras which already has
patches touching mce_amd.c.

Oh, and lastly, needless to say, it needs to be tested on a "normal",
i.e. !numascale AMD multinode box, in case you haven't done so yet. :-)

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/