Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user sampleswith kernel samples

[John Stultz]

On 04/04/2013 01:12 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:57 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I follow this. If perf exported data came with CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> > timestamps, no correlation would need to be exposed.  perf would just have
> > to do the extra overhead of doing the conversion on export.
> There is no explicit export operation in perf.  You record a sample when
> the counter overflows and generates an NMI interrupt. In the NMI interrupt
> handler, the sample record is written to the sampling buffer. That is when
> the timestamp is generated. The sampling buffer is directly accessible to
> users via mmap(). The perf tool just dumps the raw sampling buffer into
> a file, no sample record is modified or even looked at. The processing
> of the samples is done offline (via perf report) and could be done on
> another machine. In other words, the perf.data file is self-contained.
Ah. Ok, I didn't realize perfs buffers were directly mmaped.  I was 
thinking perf could do the translation not at NMI time but when the 
buffer was later read by the application.  That helps explain some of 
the constraints.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/