Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the xilinx tree

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
> > > Interesting. I rebased my arm-next branch based on 3.9-rc5
> > > with some Rob's + one Arnd patch from arm-soc - clksrc/cleanup branch.
> > >
> > > I will fix my arm-next branch.
> >
> > The for-next branch in arm-soc is not stable, you should never base
> > anything on it. If you depend on some stable branch, that is in arm-soc,
> > then use just that branch, not one of the next/* branches or for-next.
> >
> 
> I haven't based on arm-soc for-next branch my arm-next branch.
> I just took all patches I need for zynq and done git rebase v3.5-rc5.
> Which caused that I have became commuter of that 4 patches
> and there is probably any conflict between your for-next branch and
> clksrc/cleanup
> which you have resolved in for-next branch.

Ah, I see. That was actually my fault, I'm sorry for causing trouble
here and then accusing you instead.

> And because of my rebase sha1 are different that's why Stephen
> had problem with it.
> I have changed my arm-next branch and will see on Monday if Stephen
> will report any problem or not.

Ok, thanks!

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/