Re: [PATCH 0/2] hfs/hfsplus: Modernize logging styles
From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue Apr 09 2013 - 06:39:51 EST
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 11:08 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 09:37 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Joe Perches (2):
> > hfs/hfsplus: Convert dprint to hfs_dbg
> > hfs/hfsplus: Convert printks to pr_<level>
> But I have some additional suggestions:
> (1) I think that it makes sense to use no_printk() for the case when we
> don't need in debug output.
no_printk is used simply to get gcc to verify
format and args with __printf().
The equivalent is already done by the
if (DBG_##FLAG & DBG_MASK)
when DBG_MASK is 0
> (2) I think that it is really necessary to add info about file and line
> number for the case of debug output.
I don't. I think file/line is pretty useless.
Adding dynamic_debug could be useful, but that's
Also, checkpatch can be a useful tool, but all
its warnings aren't necessary to always be fixed.
Also, please remember to trim your replies.
It's not necessary to quote the entire email.
Just quote the useful contextual bits.
_Lots_ of people read this list and you can
cause a lot to waste time looking for additional
comments you don't make.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/