Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for!PREEMPT_COUNT
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Apr 10 2013 - 03:12:46 EST
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 07:32 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Something like the attached (still untested, although it seems to at
> least compile) patch. Comments?
Yes, makes me feel far more comfortable than this "asm volatile"
business (which as you noted has holes in it).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/