Re: [PATCH 06/18] compat: backport ASYNC_DOMAIN_EXCLUSIVE()
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Wed Apr 10 2013 - 15:28:11 EST
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 12:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > However, it seems entirely pointless to backport just a small part of
> > the API?
> Oh I agree don't get me wrong, however porting kernel/async.c seems
> like a rather separate effort worth considering. As-is though I have
> not seen any negative impact though to keep older subsystems from
> compiling, ie its a no-op for older kernels as I see it.
I guess that's what I don't understand -- I don't see usages of
ASYNC_DOMAIN_EXCLUSIVE in any header files, and in e.g. regulator/core.c
you'd also need the functions async_schedule_domain() etc. So where does
this help even compiling?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/