Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: arch_timer: Silence debug preempt warnings

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Fri Apr 12 2013 - 20:49:53 EST


On 04/06/13 03:41, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:57:29 -0700, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Hot-plugging with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y on a device with arm
>> architected timers causes a slew of "using smp_processor_id() in
>> preemptible" warnings:
>>
>> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sh/111
>> caller is arch_timer_cpu_notify+0x14/0xc8
>>
>> This happens because sometimes the cpu notifier,
>> arch_timer_cpu_notify(), is called in preemptible context and
>> other times in non-preemptible context but we use this_cpu_ptr()
>> to retrieve the clockevent in all cases. We're only going to
>> actually use the pointer in non-preemptible context though, so
>> push the this_cpu_ptr() access down into the cases to force the
>> checks to occur only in non-preemptible contexts.
>>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> * Pushed down this_cpu_ptr and added a comment
>>
>> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>> index d7ad425..a65a710 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>> @@ -248,14 +248,16 @@ static void __cpuinit arch_timer_stop(struct
>> clock_event_device *clk)
>> static int __cpuinit arch_timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>> unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>> {
>> - struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt);
>> -
>> + /*
>> + * Grab cpu pointer in each case to avoid spurious
>> + * preemptible warnings
>> + */
>> switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
>> case CPU_STARTING:
>> - arch_timer_setup(evt);
>> + arch_timer_setup(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
>> break;
>> case CPU_DYING:
>> - arch_timer_stop(evt);
>> + arch_timer_stop(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
>> break;
>> }
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>

Thanks Marc.

Thomas/John, can you pick this up for 3.10?

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/