Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c: mux: Add i2c-arb-gpio-challenge 'mux' driver

[Wolfram Sang]

Doug,

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:34:28PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> The i2c-arb-gpio-challenge driver implements an I2C arbitration scheme
> where masters need to claim the bus with a GPIO before they can start
> a transcation.  This should generally only be used when standard I2C
> multimaster isn't appropriate for some reason (errata/bugs).
> 
> This driver is based on code that Simon Glass added to the i2c-s3c2410
> driver in the Chrome OS kernel 3.4 tree.  The current incarnation as a
> mux driver is as suggested by Grant Likely.  See
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1877311/> for some history.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>

Mostly good, except for some documentation updates.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..726e099
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +GPIO-based I2C Arbitration
> +==========================
> +This uses GPIO lines to arbitrate who is the master of an I2C bus in a
> +multimaster situation.

"uses GPIO lines and a challange & response mechanism" or something like
that. There might be other GPIO based arbitrations in the future (though
I hope there won't).

> +
> +In many cases using GPIOs to arbitrate is not needed and a design can use
> +the standard I2C multi-master rules.  Using GPIOs is generally useful in
> +the case where there is a device on the bus that has errata and/or bugs
> +that makes standard multimaster mode not feasible.

I like this paragraph!

...

> +- their-claim-gpios: The GPIOs that the other sides use the claim the bus.
> +  Note that some implementations may only support a single other master.

Stronger? "Currently, only one other master is supported"?

...

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig
> index 0be5b83..ab4dcaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig
> @@ -5,6 +5,17 @@
>  menu "Multiplexer I2C Chip support"
>  	depends on I2C_MUX
>  
> +config I2C_ARB_GPIO_CHALLENGE
> +	tristate "GPIO-based I2C arbitration"
> +	depends on GENERIC_GPIO && OF
> +	help
> +	  If you say yes to this option, support will be included for an
> +	  I2C multimaster arbitration scheme using GPIOs where masters have
> +	  to claim the bus by asserting a GPIO.

"callenge & response"?

...

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bda020a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
> +/*
> + * GPIO-based I2C Arbitration

"callenge & response"?

...

> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Google, Inc
> + *
> + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
> + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i2c_arbitrator_data - Driver data for I2C arbitrator
> + *
> + * @parent: Parent adapter
> + * @child: Child bus
> + * @our_gpio: GPIO we'll use to claim.
> + * @our_gpio_release: 0 if active high; 1 if active low; AKA if the GPIO ==
> + *   this then consider it released.
> + * @their_gpio: GPIO that the other side will use to claim.
> + * @their_gpio_release: 0 if active high; 1 if active low; AKA if the GPIO ==
> + *   this then consider it released.
> + * @slew_delay_us: microseconds to wait for a GPIO to go high.
> + * @wait_retry_us: we'll attempt another claim after this many microseconds.
> + * @wait_free_us: we'll give up after this many microseconds.
> + */
> +
> +struct i2c_arbitrator_data {
> +	struct i2c_adapter *parent;
> +	struct i2c_adapter *child;
> +

No empty line.

> +	int		our_gpio;
> +	int		our_gpio_release;
> +	int		their_gpio;
> +	int		their_gpio_release;
> +	unsigned int	slew_delay_us;
> +	unsigned int	wait_retry_us;
> +	unsigned int	wait_free_us;
> +};

Single space as indentaion after "int".

Other than that, looks fine to me.

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/