Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Mon Apr 22 2013 - 11:34:36 EST


Hi Stephen,

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic
> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an
> arm64 compiler.
>
> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in
> at the same time.
>
> Stephen Boyd (4):
> ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member
> ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier
> ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock
> ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64()
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h | 5 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c | 14 +----
> arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able
to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree
this series was based on.

What do I need to use as the base for this series?

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/