Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2

[Stephen Boyd]

On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic
>> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an
>> arm64 compiler.
>>
>> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in
>> at the same time.
>>
>> Stephen Boyd (4):
>>   ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member
>>   ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier
>>   ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock
>>   ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64()
>>
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h |   5 +-
>>  arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c       |  14 +----
>>  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c      | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able
> to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree
> this series was based on.
>
> What do I need to use as the base for this series?

These are based on next-20130419.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/