[PATCH 09/10] nohz: Re-evaluate the tick for the new task after a context switch

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Mon Apr 22 2013 - 15:00:44 EST


When a task is scheduled in, it may have some properties
of its own that could make the CPU reconsider the need for
the tick: posix cpu timers, perf events, ...

So notify the full dynticks subsystem when a task gets
scheduled in and re-check the tick dependency at this
stage. This is done through a self IPI to avoid messing
up with any current lock scenario.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/tick.h | 2 ++
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index e31e676..9180f4b 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -163,12 +163,14 @@ extern int tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu);
extern void tick_nohz_full_check(void);
extern void tick_nohz_full_kick(void);
extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_all(void);
+extern void tick_nohz_task_switch(struct task_struct *tsk);
#else
static inline void tick_nohz_init(void) { }
static inline int tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return 0; }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_check(void) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick(void) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_all(void) { }
+static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
#endif


diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9ad3500..dd09def 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1896,6 +1896,8 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
kprobe_flush_task(prev);
put_task_struct(prev);
}
+
+ tick_nohz_task_switch(current);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index d0ed190..12a900d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -232,6 +232,26 @@ void tick_nohz_full_kick_all(void)
preempt_enable();
}

+/*
+ * Re-evaluate the need for the tick as we switch the current task.
+ * It might need the tick due to per task/process properties:
+ * perf events, posix cpu timers, ...
+ */
+void tick_nohz_task_switch(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
+ return;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
+ if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped() && !can_stop_full_tick())
+ tick_nohz_full_kick();
+
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
int tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
{
if (!have_nohz_full_mask)
--
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/