Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.4.41-rt55-feat1

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Thu Apr 25 2013 - 08:49:17 EST


On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 08:43 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:32 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 04/25/2013 01:14 PM, Tim Sander wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the
> > > > following error:
> > > >
> > > > kernel/hrtimer.c: In function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns':
> > > > kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:7: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > > 'hrtimer_rt_defer'
> > > > kernel/hrtimer.c: At top level:
> > > > kernel/hrtimer.c:1416:12: error: static declaration of 'hrtimer_rt_defer'
> > > > follows non-static declaration
> > > > kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:10: note: previous implicit declaration of
> > > > 'hrtimer_rt_defer' was here
> > > >
> > > > The kernelconfig is attached.
> > >
> > > You do not have CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS defined. Is this on purpose?
> >
> > git@marge:~/linux-2.6> ls -1 arch/arm/configs|wc -l
> > 122
> > git@marge:~/linux-2.6> grep -IR CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS arch/arm/configs|wc -l
> > 31
> >
> > Oh. Sniff, poor little things.
> >
> > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug
>
> Perhaps the better solution is to select HIGH_RES_TIMERS when
> PREEMPT_RT_FULL is selected?

If they have support, most definitely. I got the impression lots of ARM
boxen are impoverished.. why else would they not have it already set?

-Mike


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/