Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: video: add function to support unregister backlight

[Aaron Lu]

On 04/22/2013 08:39 PM, Chun-Yi Lee wrote:
> From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@xxxxxxxx>
>
> There have situation we unregister whole acpi/video driver by downstream driver
> just want to remove backlight control interface of acpi/video. It caues we lost
> other functions of acpi/video, e.g. transfer acpi event to input event.
>
> So, this patch add a new function, find_video_unregister_backlight, it provide
> the interface let downstream driver can tell acpi/video to unregister backlight
> interface of all acpi video devices. Then we can keep functions of acpi/video
> but only remove backlight support.
>
> Reference: bko#35622
>          https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35622
>
> Tested-by: Andrzej Krentosz <endrjux@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Corentin Chary <corentincj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/video.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/acpi/video.h |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> index 313f959..acd2e7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -1793,6 +1793,52 @@ static int __init intel_opregion_present(void)
>   	return opregion;
>   }
>
> +static acpi_status
> +find_video_unregister_backlight(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context,
> +				void **rv)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
> +	struct acpi_video_bus *video = NULL;
> +	struct acpi_video_device *dev, *next;
> +
> +	if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))
> +		return AE_OK;
> +
> +	if (!acpi_match_device_ids(acpi_dev, video_device_ids)) {
> +		video = acpi_driver_data(acpi_dev);
> +		acpi_video_bus_stop_devices(video);
> +		mutex_lock(&video->device_list_lock);
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, next, &video->video_device_list,
> +					entry) {
> +			if (dev->backlight) {
> +				backlight_device_unregister(dev->backlight);
> +				dev->backlight = NULL;
> +				kfree(dev->brightness->levels);
> +				kfree(dev->brightness);
> +			}

The cooling_dev should also be unregistered I think.

Thanks,
Aaron

> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&video->device_list_lock);
> +		acpi_video_bus_start_devices(video);
> +	}
> +	return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +void acpi_video_backlight_unregister(void)
> +{
> +	if (!register_count) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the acpi video bus is already unloaded, don't
> +		 * unregister backlight of devices and return directly.
> +		 */
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
> +			    ACPI_UINT32_MAX, find_video_unregister_backlight,
> +			    NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +	return;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_video_backlight_unregister);
> +
>   int acpi_video_register(void)
>   {
>   	int result = 0;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/video.h b/include/acpi/video.h
> index 61109f2..1e810a1 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/video.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/video.h
> @@ -19,11 +19,13 @@ struct acpi_device;
>   #if (defined CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO || defined CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO_MODULE)
>   extern int acpi_video_register(void);
>   extern void acpi_video_unregister(void);
> +extern void acpi_video_backlight_unregister(void);
>   extern int acpi_video_get_edid(struct acpi_device *device, int type,
>   			       int device_id, void **edid);
>   #else
>   static inline int acpi_video_register(void) { return 0; }
>   static inline void acpi_video_unregister(void) { return; }
> +static inline void acpi_video_backlight_unregister(void) { return; }
>   static inline int acpi_video_get_edid(struct acpi_device *device, int type,
>   				      int device_id, void **edid)
>   {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/