Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: move subsystem mutex to pinctrl_dev struct

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Fri Apr 26 2013 - 10:59:42 EST


On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 April 2013 11:01:59 Linus Walleij wrote:
>> /**
>> - * pinctrl_lookup_state() - retrieves a state handle from a pinctrl handle
>> - * @p: the pinctrl handle to retrieve the state from
>> - * @name: the state name to retrieve
>> + * pinctrl_select_state() - select/activate/program a pinctrl state to HW
>> + * @p: the pinctrl handle for the device that requests configuration
>> + * @state: the state handle to select/activate/program
>> */
>> -struct pinctrl_state *pinctrl_lookup_state(struct pinctrl *p, const char *name)
>> -{
>> - struct pinctrl_state *s;
>> -
>> - mutex_lock(&pinctrl_mutex);
>> - s = pinctrl_lookup_state_locked(p, name);
>> - mutex_unlock(&pinctrl_mutex);
>> -
>> - return s;
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_lookup_state);
>> -
>> -static int pinctrl_select_state_locked(struct pinctrl *p,
>> - struct pinctrl_state *state)
>> +int pinctrl_select_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_state *state)
>> {
>> struct p
>
>
> This showed up in linux-next and broke a lot of driver modules, since you
> remove the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_lookup_state) line.

No that one is just moved ... I think you're seeing that
pinctrl_select_state() has lost its export. I'll fix this up
and send a v3.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/