Re: [PATCH V4 5/9] mtd: replace the hardcode with the onfi_feature()

[Huang Shijie]

ä 2013å05æ02æ 13:42, Gupta, Pekon åé:
> > > > -	*busw = 0;
> > > > -	if (le16_to_cpu(p->features)&   1)
> > > > -		*busw = NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> > > > +
> > > > +	*busw = (onfi_feature(chip)&   ONFI_FEATURE_16_BIT_BUS) ?
> > > > +			NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 : 0;
> > > Is this really needed ? you have already checked the 'onfi_version'
> > above in
> > > nand_flash_detect_onfi() ..
> > > 	if (!chip->onfi_version) {
> > > 		pr_info("%s: unsupported ONFI version: %d\n",
> > __func__, val);
> > > 		return 0;
> > > 	}
> > I think checking the onfi_version has no relationship with this patch. :)
> > This patch is just replace the hardcode for 16-bit onfi nand check.
> [Pekon]: [Patch 3/9]: add a helper to get the supported features
> I mean, do you really need this helper function ?
> +static inline int onfi_feature(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> +       return chip->onfi_version ? le16_to_cpu(chip->onfi_params.features) : 0;
> + }
>
> Following change should have been enough..
> *busw = (le16_to_cpu(p->features)&   ONFI_FEATURE_16_BIT_BUS) ?
> 			NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 : 0;
yes. for this function, it's enough.

But we may use the onfi_feature() in other places, such as some drivers. That's reason why i added this helper.



thanks
Huang Shijie










--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/