Re: [PATCH] dma: tegra: implement suspend/resume callbacks

From: Stephen Warren
Date: Thu May 02 2013 - 14:42:41 EST


On 04/30/2013 04:30 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:24:27PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Implement suspend/resume callbacks to store APB DMA channel's
>> register on suspend and restore APB DMA channel's register on
>> resume.
...
> You dont seem to handle suspend when DMA is active? Otherwise looks fine.
> Stephen, you okay with this patch?

Yes, I think this looks fine. Sorry for the slow response; I was on
vacation.

One question though: Laxman mentioned that DMA clients were responsible
for suspending their DMA accesses themselves. Does the dmaengine core
define the semantics here; are DMA drivers supposed to handle suspend
with active DMAs, or should DMA clients suspend their DMA accesses
themselves as Laxman suggests? If the latter, I wonder if we actually
need to save/restore all the registers, since after resume, a new DMA
access would be started in all cases, which would then reprogram the HW.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/