Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] af_unix: use freezable blocking calls in read

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun May 05 2013 - 07:15:41 EST


On Saturday, May 04, 2013 03:23:30 PM Colin Cross wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello, Rafael.
> >
> > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Heh, so you are aware of the deadlock possibilities. Good selection
> >>> of spots. For all the conversion patches.
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> I wonder if that includes [3/10] (just to get the record straight)?
> >
> > I think we want the lockdep annotations before these go in. I'll
> > review Colin's new series later today.
>
> Just to make sure the merge order is clear, the two patches I posted
> yesterday to reintroduce the lockdep warning in try_to_freeze()
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/3/488) need to be merged first, then I
> will repost this series on top of that one.

OK, thanks for the clarification.

Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/