Re: [PATCH] x86, microcode: Add local mutex to not hit a deadlock.

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Wed May 08 2013 - 14:41:54 EST


On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:22:35PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:13:03PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > This can easily be triggered if a new CPU is added (via
> > ACPI hotplug mechanism) and from user-space do:
> >
> > echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online
> >
> > (or wait for UDEV to do it) on a newly appeared CPU.
> >
> > The deadlock is that the "store_online" in drivers/base/cpu.c
> > takes the cpu_hotplug_driver_lock() lock, then calls "cpu_up".
> > "cpu_up" eventually ends up calling "save_mc_for_early"
> > which also takes the cpu_hotplug_driver_lock() lock.
> >
> > And here is that kernel thinks of it:
> >
> > smpboot: Stack at about ffff880075c39f44
> > smpboot: CPU3: has booted.
> > microcode: CPU3 sig=0x206a7, pf=0x2, revision=0x25
> >
> > =============================================
> > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> > 3.9.0upstream-10129-g167af0e #1 Not tainted
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > sh/2487 is trying to acquire lock:
> > (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20
> >
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> > Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >
> > CPU0
> > ----
> > lock(x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex);
> > lock(x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex);
> >
> > *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> Ok, just for my own understanding: is this something which can actually
> happen now?

Yes. Since v3.9 I've been getting this.
>
> Judging by the presence of traces, it can be triggered in a guest,
> correct?

Correct. I don't have the hardware to test this on baremetal but looking
at how processor-driver.c works I would think this would be hit there as well.

>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/