Re: 3.10-rc1 system starts regular boot when waking from s2ram

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Wed May 15 2013 - 04:01:32 EST


On Tue 14-05-13 22:09:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 06:01:08 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am not able to make my system wake up from s2ram with 3.10-rc1. The
> > system simply starts booting as if it wasn't suspended. 3.9 works
> > without any issues.
> >
> > pm_test testing (with no_console_suspend) shows that platform is the
> > last mode which wakes up normally. processors mode already starts with a
> > regular boot. The log doesn't say anything interesting:
> >
> > $ echo processors > /sys/power/pm_test
> > $ echo mem > /sys/power/state
> > [ 61.012533] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > [ 61.017944] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
> > [ 61.033050] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
> > [ 61.081647] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > [ 61.081724] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Stopping disk
> >
> > then it waits for 5s as expected and starts booting from scratch without
> > anything in the log.
> >
> > Same test with
> > $ echo platform > /sys/power/pm_test
> > $ echo mem > /sys/power/state
> > [ 34.960477] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > [ 34.967624] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
> > [ 34.983936] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
> > [ 35.056655] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > [ 35.056800] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Stopping disk
> > [ 41.255957] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
> > [ 41.316267] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> > [ 41.316354] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> > [ 41.316428] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> > [ 41.316507] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> > [ 41.316958] ata1.00: ACPI cmd 00/00:00:00:00:00:a0 (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04)
> > [ 41.388315] ata1.00: ACPI cmd 00/00:00:00:00:00:a0 (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04)
> > [ 41.389142] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> > [ 41.391172] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100
> > [ 41.396198] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
> > [ 41.396533] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
> > [ 41.396767] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Radio type=0x0-0x3-0x1
> > [ 41.638698] PM: resume of devices complete after 724.548 msecs
> > [ 41.638835] Restarting tasks ... done.
> > [ 41.640747] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state
> > [ 42.848988] [drm] Enabling RC6 states: RC6 on, RC6p off, RC6pp off
> > [ 42.850380] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
> > [ 42.850380] TDH <0>
> > [ 42.850380] TDT <11>
> > [ 42.850380] next_to_use <11>
> > [ 42.850380] next_to_clean <0>
> > [ 42.850380] buffer_info[next_to_clean]:
> > [ 42.850380] time_stamp <ffff034b>
> > [ 42.850380] next_to_watch <0>
> > [ 42.850380] jiffies <ffff04d9>
> > [ 42.850380] next_to_watch.status <0>
> > [ 42.850380] MAC Status <80000>
> > [ 42.850380] PHY Status <7949>
> > [ 42.850380] PHY 1000BASE-T Status <0>
> > [ 42.850380] PHY Extended Status <3000>
> > [ 42.850380] PCI Status <10>
> > [ 44.066855] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
> >
> > Is the issue known?
>
> No.
>
> > Can I provide more information to help with debugging this issue.
>
> I'm not sure.
>
> > I am quite busy to bisect this ATM but can do it
> > if this is the only choice left.
>
> Well, it probably is. I'll try to reproduce it, but if I can't ...

OK, I am bisecting now. 6 iterations left...

> Anyway, the general PM changes essentially are not so invasive as to cause
> something like this to happen, so I'm kind of suspecting x86.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/