RE: [PATCH] virtio-net: Reporting traffic queue distributionstatistics through ethtool

From: Narasimhan, Sriram
Date: Thu May 16 2013 - 22:44:59 EST


Thanks for the pointer to the earlier discussion thread.
I am open to any consensus format. I would also like to
get feedback from Michael on maintaining the stats in the
per-queue data structure.

Sriram

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 2:48 PM
To: Narasimhan, Sriram
Cc: mst@xxxxxxxxxx; rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: Reporting traffic queue distribution statistics through ethtool

On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 13:24 -0700, Sriram Narasimhan wrote:
> This patch allows virtio-net driver to report traffic distribution
> to inbound/outbound queues through ethtool -S. The per_cpu
> virtnet_stats is split into receive and transmit stats and are
> maintained on a per receive_queue and send_queue basis.
> virtnet_stats() is modified to aggregate interface level statistics
> from per-queue statistics. Sample output below:
>
> NIC statistics:
> rxq0: rx_packets: 4357802
> rxq0: rx_bytes: 292642052
> txq0: tx_packets: 824540
> txq0: tx_bytes: 55256404
> rxq1: rx_packets: 0
> rxq1: rx_bytes: 0
> txq1: tx_packets: 1094268
> txq1: tx_bytes: 73328316
> rxq2: rx_packets: 0
> rxq2: rx_bytes: 0
> txq2: tx_packets: 1091466
> txq2: tx_bytes: 73140566
> rxq3: rx_packets: 0
> rxq3: rx_bytes: 0
> txq3: tx_packets: 1093043
> txq3: tx_bytes: 73246142
>
> Signed-off-by: Sriram Narasimhan <sriram.narasimhan@xxxxxx>
[...]

That ordering is totally unreadable. I want to see patches for ethtool
to let the user order and aggregate the queue statistics in a sensible
way:

$ ethtool -S eth0 # default would show aggregated statistics
NIC statistics:
rx_packets: 4357802
rx_bytes: 292642052
tx_packets: 4103317
tx_bytes: 274971428

$ ethtool -S eth0 full group queue # full statistics, grouped by queue name
NIC statistics:
rxq0:
rx_packets: 4357802
rx_bytes: 292642052
rxq1:
rx_packets: 0
rx_bytes: 0
[...]
txq0:
tx_packets: 824540
tx_bytes: 55256404
txq1:
tx_packets: 1094268
tx_bytes: 73328316
[...]

$ ethtool -S eth0 full group statistic # full statistics, grouped by statistic name
NIC statistics:
rx_packets:
rxq0: 4357802
rxq1: 0
rxq2: 0
rxq3: 0
rx_bytes:
rxq0: 292642052
rxq1: 0
rxq2: 0
rxq3: 0
[...]

Maybe even:

$ ethtool -S eth0 full table
NIC statistics:
rx_packets rx_bytes
rxq0: 4357802 292642052
rxq1: 0 0
rxq2: 0 0
rxq3: 0 0
tx_packets tx_bytes
txq0: 824540 55256404
txq1: 1094268 73328316
txq2: 1091466 73140566
txq3: 1093043 73246142

(Difficult to do, but probably very useful!)

The queue names should be rx-<index> and tx-<index> like in sysfs.

We'll need to reach a consensus on the naming scheme for per-queue and
otherwise disaggregated statistics (see previous discussions in
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.virtualization/15572/focus=15608>). I don't much care what they look like as long as there's an implementation for the ethtool side and they don't look too awful in older versions of ethtool.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶Ÿÿà -»+ƒùdš_