Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf report: Don't be bothered with locking whenadding hist entries

[Jiri Olsa]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:09:03AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@xxxxxxx>
> 
> The perf report is single-threaded, so no need to grab a lock.
> Although the fast path of pthread_mutex_[un]lock() is very fast,
> there's ~3% gain by eliminating it when we have huge sample data.
> 
>   $ perf record -a -F 100000 -o perf.data.bench -- perf bench sched all
>   $ perf record -e cycles:upp -o perf.data.before -- \
>   > perf report -i perf.data.bench --stdio > /dev/null
>   ... apply this patch ...
>   $ perf record -e cycles:upp -o perf.data.after -- \
>   > perf report -i perf.data.bench --stdio > /dev/null
>   $ perf diff perf.data.{before,after} | grep pthread
>              +0.02%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] _pthread_cleanup_push_defer
>              +0.02%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] _pthread_cleanup_pop_restore
>      0.05%   -0.05%  perf                [.] pthread_mutex_unlock@plt
>      0.05%   -0.05%  perf                [.] pthread_mutex_lock@plt
>      1.01%   -1.01%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] pthread_mutex_lock
>      1.68%   -1.68%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt
>      0.05%   -0.05%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] pthread_mutex_unlock
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

nice :)

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/