[PATCH 03/15] f2fs: fix por_doing variable coverage

From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Sun May 19 2013 - 23:35:06 EST


The reason of using sbi->por_doing is to alleviate data writes during the
recovery.
The find_fsync_dnodes() produces some dirty dentry pages, so we should
cover it too with sbi->por_doing.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index 993b601..f77aedd 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ int recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode_list);

/* step #1: find fsynced inode numbers */
+ sbi->por_doing = 1;
err = find_fsync_dnodes(sbi, &inode_list);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -385,13 +386,12 @@ int recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
goto out;

/* step #2: recover data */
- sbi->por_doing = 1;
err = recover_data(sbi, &inode_list, CURSEG_WARM_NODE);
- sbi->por_doing = 0;
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode_list));
out:
destroy_fsync_dnodes(sbi, &inode_list);
kmem_cache_destroy(fsync_entry_slab);
+ sbi->por_doing = 0;
write_checkpoint(sbi, false);
return err;
}
--
1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/