Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf: net_dropmonitor: Make it work and make it fast

[Neil Horman]

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 09:33 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:42:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Somewhat surprisingly, the net_dropmonitor reporting script doesn't work
> > > at all.  This series fixes it and then makes it slightly more efficient.
> > > 
> > > Ben.
> > > 
> > It worked fine when I first submitted it.  I wonder if there was a paramter
> > order change at some point that I wasn't CC'ed on.
> 
> The parameter order for the trace event changed in 2.6.39, but that was
> before this script went in.
> 
Hm, I wonder if I developed it on 2.6.38, that sounds like around the time it
went it.
Neil

> Ben.
> 
> > Either way, this all looks good.  Thanks Ben.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > > Ben Hutchings (5):
> > >   perf: net_dropmonitor: Fix trace parameter order
> > >   perf: net_dropmonitor: Fix symbol-relative addresses
> > >   perf: net_dropmonitor: Do not assume ordering of dictionaries
> > >   perf: net_dropmonitor: Use bisection in symbol lookup
> > >   perf: net_dropmonitor: Remove progress indicator
> > > 
> > >  tools/perf/scripts/python/net_dropmonitor.py |   39 ++++++++++++++------------
> > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Ben Hutchings
> friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/