Re: XFS assertion from truncate. (3.10-rc2)

From: Dave Chinner
Date: Tue May 21 2013 - 20:16:11 EST


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:08:03PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:54:10AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 07:40:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:34:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:52:57PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > > [ 464.210598] XFS: Assertion failed: (mask & (ATTR_MODE|ATTR_UID|ATTR_GID|ATTR_ATIME|ATTR_ATIME_SET| ATTR_MTIME_SET|ATTR_KILL_SUID|ATTR_KILL_SGID| ATTR_KILL_PRIV|ATTR_TIMES_SET)) == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c, line: 719
> > > >
> > > > Never seen that fire before, but this is why we have ASSERT()s like
> > > > this - we're being handed something by the VFS we don't expect...
> > > >
> > > > Can you give me some context of the file permissions before the
> > > > syscall and what the syscall parameters are? i.e. is this likely to
> > > > be trying to strip SUID/SGID during the truncate operation?
> > >
> > > no idea tbh. Is there something I can add to that assert to dump
> > > which file it was triggered by ?
> >
> > Convert the assert to a if (), and then in the body do something
> > like:
> >
> > if (mask & (...) {
> > char buf[MAX_PATHLEN];
> >
> > d_path(VFS_I(ip)->i_dentry, buf, MAXPATHLEN);
> > xfs_warn(mp, "%s: mask 0x%x mismatch on file %s\n",
> > __func__, mask, buf);
> > ASSERT(0);
> > }
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c: In function âxfs_setattr_sizeâ:
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c:723:17: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of âd_pathâ
> d_path(VFS_I(ip)->i_dentry, buf, MAXPATHLEN);
> ^

Oh, sorry, dentry_path() is the version that takes a dentry as the
first parameter. I always get the two confused...

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/