Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: Define dma_{alloc,free}_attrs() forall archs

[Damian Hobson-Garcia]

Hello,
On 2013/04/30 12:01, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
> Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, have implementations for
> both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs().  All achitectures that do
> not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by
> dma-mapping-broken.h.
> 
> Provide a default definition for the archs that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y,
> but have no implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs(). 
> 
> As I don't have hardware for any of these systems, the patches are only
> compile-tested where I could (arm64, s390) and untested for the archs
> where I couldn't find a readily available prebuilt cross-compiler (c6x, parisc).
> 


>  arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h  |   17 +++++++++++------
>  arch/c6x/include/asm/dma-mapping.h    |    3 +++
>  arch/parisc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |    3 +++
>  arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h   |   17 +++++++++++------
>  4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 

Since this series spans several architectures, what would be the best
way to have this patch series merged?
Should I resubmit each patch to the mailing list for each architecture
separately?

Thank you,
Damian

-- 
Damian Hobson-Garcia
IGEL Co.,Ltd
http://www.igel.co.jp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/