Re: [PATCH] swap: avoid read_swap_cache_async() race to deadlockwhile waiting on discard I/O compeletion

[Rafael Aquini]

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:55:39PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:05:00PM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > read_swap_cache_async() can race against get_swap_page(), and stumble across
> > a SWAP_HAS_CACHE entry in the swap map whose page wasn't brought into the
> > swapcache yet. This transient swap_map state is expected to be transitory,
> > but the actual placement of discard at scan_swap_map() inserts a wait for
> > I/O completion thus making the thread at read_swap_cache_async() to loop
> > around its -EEXIST case, while the other end at get_swap_page()
> > is scheduled away at scan_swap_map(). This can leave the system deadlocked
> > if the I/O completion happens to be waiting on the CPU workqueue where
> 
> waitqueue?
>

Ugh! I will repost this to fix it and the "compeletion" typo at subject...


> > read_swap_cache_async() is busy looping and !CONFIG_PREEMPT.
> > 
> > This patch introduces a cond_resched() call to make the aforementioned
> > read_swap_cache_async() busy loop condition to bail out when necessary,
> > thus avoiding the subtle race window.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  mm/swap_state.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> > index b3d40dc..9ad9e3b 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> > @@ -336,8 +336,20 @@ struct page *read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> >  		 * Swap entry may have been freed since our caller observed it.
> >  		 */
> >  		err = swapcache_prepare(entry);
> > -		if (err == -EEXIST) {	/* seems racy */
> > +		if (err == -EEXIST) {
> >  			radix_tree_preload_end();
> > +			/*
> > +			 * We might race against get_swap_page() and stumble
> > +			 * across a SWAP_HAS_CACHE swap_map entry whose page
> > +			 * has not been brought into the swapcache yet, while
> > +			 * the other end is scheduled away waiting on discard
> > +			 * I/O completion.
> > +			 * In order to avoid turning this transitory state
> > +			 * into a permanent loop around this -EEXIST case,
> > +			 * lets just conditionally invoke the scheduler,
> > +			 * if there are some more important tasks to run.
> > +			 */
> > +			cond_resched();
> 
> Might be worth mentioning the !CONFIG_PREEMPT deadlock scenario here,
> especially since under CONFIG_PREEMPT the radix_tree_preload_end() is
> already a scheduling point through the preempt_enable().
>

Nice suggestion, will do it. Thanks for reviewing this patch!


> Other than that, the patch looks good to me!
> 
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/