Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: New watchdog driver for MEN A21watchdogs

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Thu May 30 2013 - 18:02:28 EST


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:59:28PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:10:53AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:25:54PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > + watchdog_set_drvdata(&a21_wdt, drv);
> > > >
> > > > I am missing the initialisation of the watchdog's timeout value here...
> > >
> > > This watchdog only knows two timeout values, 1s and 30s with the constraint
> > > that you can't go back to 30s once your in a 1s timeout without a reset of the
> > > CPLD. I could initially set it to 30s but that would be redundant.
> > >
> > I wonder - why bother with supporting one-second timeouts ?
> >
> > Is this realistic, ie can you guarantee that the watchdog will be pinged fast
> > enough to keep the system alive under all load conditions ? As far as I know
> > you can not even configure the watchdog application for less than 1 second
> > ping intervals.
>
> that's why certain drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
> a rate of 0.5s (do a grep on HZ/2) untill userspace times out.
> (example: drivers/watchdog/pika_wdt.c or drivers/watchdog/pcwd.c).
>
Yes, I have used the same trick in a couple of my drivers. That isn't done here,
though.

I even thought about adding this capability to the infrastructure.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/